From Lifers to Leaders
America spends more than $182 billion annually on its criminal-legal system (PPI, 2025) — and among state prisoners released across 34 states in 2012, 62% were arrested again within three years (BJS, 2021). We are building the alternative.
LHF is the institution. FVRC is the village. The Prototype Pilot is the ask. Six people. Two homes. Independent evaluation.
Scroll to explore. Or skip ahead to the ask.
Lifers Hope Foundation
A California 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in 2025 — built from lived experience, academic rigor, and a conviction that justice-impacted people deserve infrastructure, not charity.
Our Mission: To build the economic infrastructure — careers, homes, savings, and ownership — that transforms reentry from a revolving door into a pathway to sovereignty.
What's Inside This Proposition
Scroll to explore each section. Each section is labeled — use the section headers to navigate.
The Organization
LHF, FVRC, and the Prototype Pilot — three levels, one mission.
The Problem
Three verified statistics. The case for change.
Who We Are
The founder, the mission, the membership, and why this model is different.
The Model
The integrated pathway from release to ownership.
The Pilot
Six Builder-Founders. Two homes. Four measurable outcomes.
The Financial Model
The savings system and capital stack — condensed.
The Partnership Ask
What we need, what each partner does, and what happens next.
Governance & Transparency
Legal status, disclosures, and the full FVRC proposal.
For the complete model, career pathways, financial structure, research citations, and governance documentation — visit the full FVRC Prototype Pilot Proposal: Review the Full Pilot Proposal →
Three Levels. One Mission.
Lifers Hope Foundation
The permanent institution. Built for the community. Sustained by it. LHF's members are formerly and currently incarcerated people, their families, and the communities most impacted by incarceration. They don't just benefit from this mission. They shape it.
Freedom Villages Regenerative Community
The flagship initiative. Not a program handed down to a community — a model designed to be built by it. FVRC integrates workforce, housing, savings, and governance into one coordinated system. The community designs it. Builds it. Governs it. The model pairs justice-involved adults (Lifers) with Transition Age Youth (TAY) in a proposed 12-month Community Builder training pathway (subject to partner authorization). Ownership is the goal — subject to final legal and financing structure.
The FVRC Prototype Pilot
The immediate ask. Six Builder-Founders — 3 Lifers paired with 3 Transition Age Youth. Two demonstration homes. One independent evaluation. 18 months to find out if this works — before we scale anything. Not the village. The proof.
The proof comes first. Then the village.
The Case in 60 Seconds
Criminal-legal-system expenditures total at least $182 billion annually (PPI, 2025) — and at least $445 billion when costs borne by affected families are included (PPI, 2026). Among state prisoners released across 34 states in 2012, 62% were rearrested within three years and 71% within five years (BJS, 2021 — 34-state cohort; arrest-based measure). Lifers Hope Foundation has designed the alternative — a post-release, community-based model designed to create a pathway for returning citizens toward homeownership, union work, and co-ownership of the system that serves them.
Annual Expenditures
Annual criminal-legal-system expenditures (PPI, 2025). Note: PPI's 2026 broader estimate, including costs borne by affected families, reaches at least $445 billion annually.
Correctional Education ROI
Estimated social return per $1 invested in correctional education — RAND Corporation (2013). Supporting evidence for one component of LHF. Not LHF's own ROI.
Cost Per Participant
Preliminary internal planning estimate per participant per year — versus ~$128,000/year to incarcerate one person in California (CA LAO, FY 2025–26). Different cost categories — not a direct comparison.
The Pipeline
From pre-qualification inside prison to union apprenticeship, savings accumulation, and homeownership eligibility — the pathway is continuous, with no gap between release and program entry. Full model detail on the Integration Model slide.
The Infrastructure
Freedom Villages Regenerative Community housing + union apprenticeship + credit union + trauma-informed support — coordinated from release — subject to secured interim-housing partnership prior to pilot launch; FVRC occupancy requires subsequent site, permitting and financing approval.
The Economics
Apprentice wages per applicable CA DIR determination, scaling annually. 10% of every paycheck building designated savings. Homeownership milestone tied to journey-level completion — typically 3–5 years for CA registered apprenticeships.
The Vision
The model is designed so participants can progressively earn ownership interests, participate in governance, and reinvest in future cohorts — building liberation, not dependency.
This is more than conventional reentry. It is a pathway from release to ownership — built from the inside out, and designed to last.
Who We Are
A California nonprofit built from the inside out — by someone who lived the system, studied it, and designed the alternative.
Lifers Hope Foundation is a California 501(c)(3) nonprofit, incorporated June 2025, founded by Arthur Agustin — USC MSW graduate, Associate Social Worker at LACDMH, LCSW candidate, and formerly incarcerated person who served two terms in CDCR including San Quentin and Pelican Bay. In March 2026, Arthur presented FVRC at the USC Phi Alpha Annual Research Symposium for academic and peer review. LHF is incorporated in California public records and has entered the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors public record.
"My journey was a crucible where suffering forged a profound sense of meaning. It is my deepest aspiration to ignite this possibility for every soul touched by incarceration — to help them transform their past into a powerful future."
— Arthur Agustin, Founder & Executive Director
Meet Our Founder
Full story on the next slide →
The Solution Is Ownership
LHF does not offer charity. It builds infrastructure — careers, homes, savings, and governance — so that justice-impacted people never have to depend on a broken system again. Participants don't receive this transformation. They earn it, build it, and own it.
The Members Shape It
LHF's members are formerly and currently incarcerated people, their families, and the communities most impacted by incarceration. The organization is designed to institutionalize their voice and governance as its formal membership structure develops.
To build the economic infrastructure — careers, homes, savings, and ownership — that transforms reentry from a revolving door into a pathway to sovereignty.
Presented for academic and peer review at the USC Phi Alpha 2026 Annual Research Symposium. Recognized in the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors public record.
The Problem We're Solving
Mass incarceration isn't a personal failure — it's a systemic challenge. Criminal-legal-system expenditures total at least $182 billion annually — and by broader estimates, far more. It strains families, fractures communities, and leaves many people released without the infrastructure they need to succeed. There is a better way forward — and we are building it.
The Price of Failure
The Prison Policy Initiative estimates criminal-legal-system expenditures at no less than $182 billion annually (PPI, 2025). PPI's 2026 broader estimate, including costs borne by affected families, reaches at least $445 billion annually.
The Revolving Door
Among state prisoners released across 34 states in 2012, 62% were rearrested within three years and 71% within five years. Many return without stable housing, employment, or coordinated support — factors widely associated with difficult reintegration. (BJS, 2021 — 34-state cohort; arrest-based measure)
America's Hidden Crisis
People incarcerated on any given day in America. (Prison Policy Initiative, 2025)
The current system was designed for punishment — and while accountability matters, rehabilitation and reintegration were never fully resourced. Lifers Hope Foundation sees this not as a reason to tear down what exists, but as an opportunity to build on it — adding the community infrastructure, economic pathways, and human investment that have always been missing.
The evidence is clear. The infrastructure is missing. Lifers Hope Foundation is building it.
Who We Are Building For
Behind every statistic is a human being. A parent. A son or daughter. Someone who made a mistake — or was failed by a system that never gave them a fair chance. We build for them. And we build with them.
People Preparing for Release
Individuals approaching release who are ready to earn wages, build skills, and plan for a life outside. They don't need charity. They need a system that works — and the chance to own a piece of it.
Returning Citizens Navigating Reentry
People recently released who face the invisible punishment of a record: no housing, no job, no bank account, no path forward. We are building the infrastructure they were never given — and the ownership stake they were never offered.
Families & Communities Impacted by Incarceration
Millions of American children have a parent who has been involved in the criminal-legal system. When one person is incarcerated, an entire family bears the cost. Our model rebuilds not just individuals — but the communities around them.
Currently Incarcerated Individuals
People still inside who are preparing, planning, and waiting. LHF's membership begins before release — because the pathway to a different life should too. Formal intake will open upon pilot authorization.
This population is not a liability. They are an untapped reservoir of resilience, talent, and determination — waiting for a system worthy of their potential. We are not building that system for them. We are building it with them.
Meet Arthur Agustin
From San Quentin and Pelican Bay to USC graduate and Psychiatric Clinical Social Worker — this blueprint was built from lived experience and academic rigor.
Arthur Agustin served two prison terms within the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. That experience didn't break him — it became his life's work. Today he is a USC Master of Social Work graduate, an Associate Social Worker (ASW) at the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH), serving as a Psychiatric Clinical Social Worker and LCSW candidate, and the founder of Lifers Hope Foundation. He didn't just survive the system. He studied it, mapped it, and designed the alternative.
In March 2026, Arthur presented FVRC at the USC Phi Alpha Annual Research Symposium as a pre-implementation capstone proposal — presented for academic and peer review at USC's social work honor society symposium.
"My journey was a crucible where suffering forged a profound sense of meaning. It is my deepest aspiration to ignite this possibility for every soul touched by incarceration — to help them transform their past into a powerful future."
— Arthur Agustin, Founder
Why This Model Is Different
Arthur's framework integrates firsthand knowledge of what breaks people inside with evidence-based social work practice. This isn't theory developed from the outside looking in — it is a blueprint built from lived experience and academic rigor — grounded in what no textbook can replicate.
He is also the author of New Beginnings: From The Bondage of Incarceration to Liberation and Freedom — The University of Hard Knocks Model.
Why Lifers Hope is Different
Most reentry programs address one piece of the problem. Lifers Hope integrates the entire pathway: Housing. Workforce. Financial infrastructure. Behavioral health. Ownership. Governance.
Five Pillars That Set Us Apart
Lived Experience Meets Academic Rigor
Founded by Arthur Agustin — CDCR veteran, USC MSW graduate, Associate Social Worker (ASW) at LACDMH serving as a Psychiatric Clinical Social Worker, and LCSW candidate. FVRC was presented at the USC Phi Alpha 2026 Annual Research Symposium as a pre-implementation capstone proposal, presented for academic and peer review at USC's social work honor society.
Comprehensive Integration, Not Fragmented Services
We integrate housing, vocational training, financial infrastructure, and trauma-informed support into one cohesive ecosystem — every element working together, not in silos. The model pairs justice-involved adults (Lifers, 50s–70s) with Transition Age Youth (TAY, 18–25) in a proposed 12-month Community Builder training pathway (subject to partner authorization).
Economic Transformation, Not Charity
Participants earn wages, build marketable skills, and under the proposed model may become eligible to hold ownership stakes in social enterprises — subject to final legal structure — shifting the paradigm from charity to lifer-owned economic power.
Research-Informed Blueprint
Published on Amazon Kindle Unlimited and reviewed by Dr. Suzanne DeBenedittis of Greenerway Associates. Interactive version available here
Trauma-Informed, Holistic Approach
We integrate behavioral health, public health frameworks, and social justice principles — addressing not just practical needs but the underlying trauma and systemic inequities that drive incarceration.
The result: a model that turns incarceration costs into community investment — and lifers into leaders, owners, and architects of the next generation's freedom.
The Village We Are Building
30 modular homes. Solar-powered. Rainwater-fed. Regeneratively landscaped. Resident-designed, resident-built, resident-governed.
Modular Homes
Permanent, equity-bearing, solar-powered units
Solar Powered
Off-grid by design — every unit with rooftop panels and battery storage
Semesters
The full build cycle — from MC-3 pre-apprenticeship to cooperative governance
Community
Resident-led. Self-governing. Built by the people who live in it.
This is not a halfway house. Not a shelter. Not a program. It is a permanent community — built by its residents, governed by its residents, owned by its residents.
What We Are Building
Freedom Villages Regenerative Community — a proposed 30-home, resident-designed, resident-built, resident-governed regenerative community.
Here is how the full model works — four pillars, four semesters, one integrated system.
Self-Built
Residents build the homes they live in. Construction is the curriculum. The pilot is designed so eligible construction hours may count toward registered-apprenticeship requirements, subject to formal partner approval and applicable standards.
Solar-Powered
Off-grid by design. Every unit is solar-powered with battery storage. Designed for energy independence — zero net utility cost is the target, subject to site feasibility, interconnection requirements, and pilot validation.
Food Sovereign
Raised permaculture beds, rainwater capture, and community gardens. Designed for food sovereignty — subject to site capacity, seasonal conditions, and pilot validation.
Self-Governed
Resident-led. Rotating leadership. The Community Circle is designed to hold final authority over program design, budget priorities, and partnerships.
30 Homes. 4 Semesters. One Integrated System.
Semester 1 — MC-3 Pre-Apprenticeship
Cohort 1 (6 participants: 3 Lifers + 3 Transition Age Youth) enters the MC-3 Multi-Craft Core Curriculum. OSHA 10 certification. Unity Protocol intergenerational pairing begins.
Semester 2 — Modular Home & Solar Assembly
Cohort 1 builds the first modular homes and installs solar systems. Cohort 2 enrolls. Cohort 1 becomes Mentor 1. Eligible build hours are designed to count toward registered-apprenticeship requirements, subject to formal partner approval and applicable standards.
Semester 3 — Rainwater & Regenerative Infrastructure
Cohort 3 enrolls. Rainwater capture systems installed. Permaculture beds established. The community is designed to move toward food sovereignty and water independence — subject to site capacity, seasonal conditions, and pilot validation.
Semester 4 — Governance & Leadership Transition
Cohort 4 enrolls. Cohort 1 graduates become founding residents and community governors. The pipeline is designed to be self-replicating. By design, the community is intended to govern itself — not by assumption, but by architecture.
By design, FVRC is intended to become self-governing — the community, not a director, holds authority. That is the point.
Proposed modular homes
permanent, equity-bearing, solar-powered
Estimated social return per $1 invested
RAND (2013) supporting evidence for one component; not LHF's own ROI
Preliminary internal planning estimate per participant per year
scope and methodology to be validated through the pilot budget
Annual cost to incarcerate one person in California
(CA LAO, FY 2025–26). The ~$18K FVRC figure uses different cost categories — not a direct comparison.
The full model is engineered. The pilot is the first test. Everything that follows depends on what the evidence shows.
Building Economic Power, Not Charity
The mission is clear. Here is how it works in practice — four interconnected pillars that together create a self-sustaining economic ecosystem, not a dependency cycle.
Living-Wage Careers
Living wages based on the applicable CA DIR prevailing wage determination for the selected trade — preliminary target range of ~$20–$26/hr entry-level, scaling to ~$40–$55/hr at journeyman level (CA DIR, 2024–2025) — earned through skill and certified apprenticeship, not granted through charity.
Stable Housing
Homes participants help design and build — with homeownership eligibility and equity treatment structured through a Community Land Trust model that keeps homes permanently affordable across generations.
Financial Infrastructure
Credit-union partnerships, designated trust accounts, and structured entrepreneurship pathways — designed to build generational wealth, not just a paycheck, with the model designed so each cohort reinvests into the next — subject to legal and financial structure.
Community Ownership
Participant-governed enterprises with profit-sharing and a lifer-led council — ensuring those who build the model have a binding voice in how it grows, evolves, and distributes its returns.
These four pillars are not parallel programs — they are a compounding system. Each pillar strengthens the others, so that over time participants accumulate real assets, real governance power, and real stakes in a community economy they helped create.
The Prototype Pilot
Two modular homes. Six Builder-Founders. One independent evaluation. The proof before the village.
Every decision to scale will be based on what this pilot produces — real data, not projections.
Builder-Founders
3 justice-involved adults (Lifers) paired with 3 Transition Age Youth (TAY)
Modular showcase homes
built to union standards
Total pilot horizon
12-month build + 6-month independent evaluation
12-month rearrest target [PILOT TARGET]
not directly comparable to the BJS 3-year figure of 62%, which uses a different observation period
Four Measurable Outcomes
Every target is pre-specified, operationally defined, and independently evaluated. A TARGET is not a FACT. We will never present them as the same.
85% Job Retention
Defined as employed at 12 months after registered apprenticeship entry. [PILOT TARGET — benchmarked from Delancey Street, Homeboy Industries, MDRC]
≤15% Recidivism
Primary measure: rearrest within 12 months of program entry. Tracked separately from reconviction and return-to-custody. [PILOT TARGET — not directly comparable to BJS 3- and 5-year figures]
100% Housing Stability
Defined as continuously housed at 6 and 12 months, without shelter entry or unsheltered homelessness. [PILOT TARGET — subject to FVRC site capacity]
Independent Evaluation
All outcomes independently evaluated. LHF will report against each metric using pre-specified operational definitions — not composite or self-reported measures.
What We Need to Launch
- Execute anchor-partner MOU — the clock starts the moment this is signed
- Anchor workforce partner (MC-3 pre-apprenticeship program tied to union jobs)
- Pilot site and land partner (Los Angeles County)
- Funder or impact investor ($500K–$1M, Phase I)
- Independent evaluation partner (doctoral-level researcher or university)
- Independent CPA as Fiscal Oversight Officer
What Each Partner Gets
- Named role in a distinctive, independently evaluated demonstration project
- Co-branded workforce development program
- Independent evaluation data — publishable, replicable
- Potential alignment with RESTART (U.S. DOL, 2026) — subject to eligibility and competitive award
- A seat at the table when Phase II scales to 30 homes
Don't fund the village yet. Fund the evidence. If it works, we scale. If it doesn't, we learn. Either way, the field is better for it.
The Integration Model: From Waiting List to Homeownership Eligibility
Proposed Framework — Implementation Contingent on Pilot Authorization
Pre-Qualification (Inside)
Express interest and pre-qualify while still incarcerated. Formal intake opens upon pilot authorization.
Release → MC-3 Pre-Apprenticeship
Day one of release. No gap. Structured pathway begins immediately. 3 Lifers paired with 3 Transition Age Youth (TAY) under the Unity Protocol intergenerational model.
MC-3 Completion → Union Apprenticeship
Top graduates selected to build Freedom Villages Regenerative Community. Paid workers from day one of selection. Wages per applicable CA DIR determination, scaling annually. Eligible build hours are designed to count toward registered-apprenticeship requirements, subject to formal partner approval and applicable standards.
Savings Accumulate → Homeownership Eligibility
10% of every paycheck into CRA-aligned credit union trust. Homeownership eligibility at journey-level completion — subject to CLT, lender, and financing structure. [PROJECTION]
Ownership → Community Builders Cooperative
Graduates govern the model. Mentor the next cohort. The pipeline is designed to be self-replicating.
The Residential Training Camp: manufacturing floor, solar installation, permaculture base, rainwater capture, Community Circle, and community dinner.
This is not a program. It is a model designed to develop toward long-term financial sustainability — engineered so that the moment a participant walks out of prison, they walk into a pathway. Journey-level completion is the milestone. The cooperative is the legacy.
Three Integrated Career Pathways
The initial pilot centers on construction. Transportation, logistics and regenerative agriculture are proposed expansion pathways subject to partner development.
Modular Home Construction & Green Building
MC-3 pre-apprenticeship → union apprenticeship → build Freedom Villages Regenerative Community → savings accumulate → homeownership eligibility. Trades: electrical, solar, drywall, roofing, masonry, rainwater systems.
Transportation & Logistics
CDL training and commercial driving certifications. Pathways to advanced certifications, supervision, and logistics management. High-demand, immediate employment. (Proposed expansion pathway — subject to partner development and pilot validation.)
Regenerative Agriculture & Sustainability
(Proposed expansion pathway — subject to partner development and pilot validation.) Sustainable farming, permaculture, and urban agriculture. Worker cooperative ownership model. Food sovereignty for the community.
FVRC in action: modular home construction, solar panel installation, rainwater capture systems, and regenerative permaculture farming.
Every pathway is fully integrated with financial literacy, credit union membership, trauma-informed behavioral health support, and community governance — because a living wage is the floor, not the ceiling.
Financial Infrastructure: The Savings & Credit System
Many people leave incarceration with limited gate money, no savings, and no coordinated financial pathway. Under this model, top MC-3 graduates walk directly into a financial infrastructure built to create wealth — not just income.
Every Paycheck
Under the proposed financial structure, 10% of each paycheck would be deposited into a designated savings or trust account — subject to formal credit-union partnership and legal review.
Illustrative 3-Year Savings
Illustrative equity accumulation range: ~$12,500–$16,200 over a 3-year apprenticeship (10% of full-time entry-level wages × 2,080 hrs/yr × 3 years, before wage progression; CA DIR, 2024–2025). [PROJECTION]
Estimated Unit Cost
PRELIMINARY PLANNING ASSUMPTION — to be validated through Phase I. Excludes land, site work, utilities, permitting, and financing unless specified.
Two Systems. Two Outcomes.
Traditional Reentry:
- ❌ Limited gate money upon release — no savings, no credit, no pathway
- ❌ Immediate financial crisis
- ❌ Return to survival mode
Lifers Hope Proposed Model:
- ✅ MC-3 pre-apprenticeship coordinated from release — subject to secured interim-housing partnership; FVRC occupancy requires subsequent site, permitting and financing approval.
- ✅ Union apprentice wages per applicable CA DIR determination, scaling to journey-level
- ✅ 10% of every paycheck building savings toward homeownership from day one of apprenticeship selection
- ✅ Credit union membership and credit-building initiated — subject to formal partnership agreement
This is not financial assistance. This is economic justice — building generational wealth in communities that have been systematically excluded from it for generations. Participants don't receive this future. They build it.
Pilot Outcome Targets: The Numbers We're Building Toward
These pilot targets are benchmarked against decades of peer program data. They represent the hypothesis the pilot is designed to test and validate through independent evaluation.
Job Retention Rate
PILOT TARGET — Defined as: employed at 12 months after registered apprenticeship entry. Benchmarked from Delancey Street, Homeboy Industries, and MDRC peer program outcomes.
Living Wages
PILOT TARGET — Entry-level apprentice to journeyman scale (CA DIR prevailing wage schedules, 2024–2025). Actual compensation varies by trade, county, apprenticeship period, shift, and applicable agreement.
Recidivism Rate
PILOT TARGET — Primary measure: rearrest within 12 months of program entry. Not directly comparable to BJS 3- and 5-year figures, which use different observation periods. LHF will also track reconviction and return-to-custody separately.
Housing Stability
PILOT TARGET — Defined as: continuously housed at 6 and 12 months, without shelter entry or unsheltered homelessness. Subject to FVRC site capacity.
The Compounding Impact of Scale
Phase 1: Prototype
- 6 Builder-Founders — selected from MC-3 pre-apprenticeship program graduates tied to union jobs
- 2 modular showcase homes built to union standards
- Real data collected: cost per unit, job placement, reduced reoffending
- Lifer-led governance council established
Phase 2: Full Scale
- 30 apprentices building 30 modular homes — original 6 advance, 24 new MC-3 pre-apprenticeship graduates join
- Community Builders Cooperative formed — worker-owned, self-governing
- Participant-governed enterprises designed to generate revenue — subject to legal and cooperative structure.
Phase 3: National Model
- Replicable blueprint validated by real outcomes — not projections
- Community Land Trust model exportable to any city or county
- A model designed to develop toward long-term financial sustainability — lifer-owned and replicable in every state
All figures marked PILOT TARGET represent intended outcomes benchmarked against peer program data (Delancey Street Foundation, Homeboy Industries, CEO, MDRC). National recidivism context: (BJS, 2021 — 34-state cohort; arrest-based measure) found 62% rearrested within 3 years and 71% within 5 years. LHF's 12-month pilot target is not directly comparable to these multi-year figures. Actual results subject to independent pilot evaluation.
What Each Partner Does in the Pilot
Each partner category has a specific, defined role in the pilot. No role is assumed — each will be formalized through written agreement prior to launch.
Site & Land Partner
Provides or facilitates access to the pilot site. Confirms zoning, land authorization, and interim housing arrangements before enrollment begins.
Apprenticeship & Labor Partner
Provides the registered apprenticeship pathway. Selects the first 6 Builder-Founders from MC-3 pre-apprenticeship graduates. Confirms placement, wages, and union standards.
Pre-Apprenticeship & Reentry Partner
Operates the MC-3 pre-apprenticeship program that feeds the pilot cohort. Confirms participant eligibility and readiness before selection.
Funder & Evaluator
Provides pilot funding ($500K–$1M range, subject to scope) and/or independent evaluation. No expansion occurs until evaluation is complete.
We are inviting partners to help build something the evidence demands and the moment requires — a reintegration model designed to last, scale, and transform lives at the systems level.
Financial Model: The Capital Stack
Transparency is the foundation of trust. The FVRC model is funded through a multi-source capital stack — designed so that no single funding source carries the full weight, and participant savings accumulation begins from day one of apprenticeship selection — subject to formal credit-union partnership and legal review.
Phase I Budget
Subject to partnership scope and pilot site confirmation
Builder-Founders
Selected from MC-3 pre-apprenticeship graduates
Demonstration Homes
Built to union standards. Not assumed to house participants during Phase I.
Estimated Unit Cost
PRELIMINARY PLANNING ASSUMPTION — to be validated through Phase I. Excludes land, site work, utilities, permitting, and financing unless specified.
Per Participant/Year
Preliminary internal planning estimate — scope and methodology to be validated through the pilot budget. California's enacted FY 2025–26 incarceration cost is approximately $128,000/person/year (CA LAO). Different cost categories — not a direct comparison.
Community Land Trust Protection
The proposed CLT-based structure is intended to preserve long-term affordability while creating a pathway to participant homeownership and equity. Final land ownership, improvement ownership, deed transfer, ground-lease terms, resale restrictions, and participant equity treatment will be established through legal design and lender approval. If a graduate exits at any stage: they keep their accrued designated savings — the home returns to Freedom Villages Regenerative Community for the next graduate. The individual keeps what they earned. The community keeps the unit.
This is not a cost. It is an investment — with a human dividend that compounds for generations and a community that sustains itself.
How to Build This With Us
The blueprint is complete. The evidence base is strong. What we need now are the partners ready to turn this framework into a functioning pilot.
Partnership Opportunities
Funders & Impact Investors
Philanthropic partners and impact investors to fund pilot launch. Initial range: $500K–$1M. (Subject to partnership scope and pilot site confirmation.) Potential alignment with RESTART (U.S. DOL, 2026) through an eligible lead applicant or consortium — eligibility and funding availability must be confirmed.
Correctional Facilities
California pilot sites committed to evidence-based reintegration and second-chance pathways.
Employers & Unions
Organizations committed to second-chance hiring and registered union apprenticeships.
Academic Partners
Universities and research centers for independent program evaluation and longitudinal research.
Every partnership is structured for mutual benefit — advancing your mission while building the infrastructure for lasting, measurable, generational transformation.
All partnerships will be formalized through written agreement prior to pilot launch. No institutional commitment is implied unless expressly established.
What Happens After You Say Yes
The moment the anchor MOU is signed, the clock starts — here is exactly what the first 12 months look like.
Months 1–2: Foundation
- Sign Anchor MOU — pilot partnership formally launches
- CLT formation initiated, zoning review begun, legal counsel retained
Months 3–6: Construction
- Six Builder-Founders pursue registered apprenticeship placement — subject to eligibility and available placements
- Construction of 2 modular showcase homes begins — to union standards
Months 7–9: Data Review
- Interim data collected: construction cost per unit, apprenticeship placement rates, and savings accumulation progress. Housing stability and recidivism outcomes are tracked through the full 18-month horizon.
- No expansion occurs until the model is validated
Months 10–12: Showcase & Phase II Decision
- 2 showcase homes presented publicly — the homes are the pitch deck
- Full-scale funding decision made — Phase II (30 apprentices, 30 homes)
12-month build. 6-month evaluation. 18-month total horizon. Phase I will validate the partnerships, test the assumptions, and determine whether the model is ready to scale.
Ready to Build This With Us?
Six people. Two homes. One independently evaluated demonstration. This is the most defensible first step LHF can take — and the most important one you can fund.
Don't fund the village yet. Fund the evidence. The next step is yours.
Organizational Structure & Current Phase
Legal Entity
Lifers Hope Foundation is a California nonprofit public-benefit corporation with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. Incorporation documents, tax-exemption determination letter, and governance materials are available through lifershopefoundation.org.
Governance
The founding board is established. Board composition, conflict-of-interest policy, and participant governance rights documentation will be published prior to pilot launch.
Financial Transparency
Annual financial reporting, budget documentation, and pilot cost model are available to prospective partners and funders upon request.
Contact
For partnership inquiries or governance information, contact LHF through lifershopefoundation.org, agustina@lifershopefoundation.org, or Review the Full Pilot Proposal →
Organizational Hierarchy
Lifers Hope Foundation is the parent nonprofit — responsible for mission, governance, fundraising, research, and partner relationships. Freedom Villages Regenerative Community is LHF's flagship initiative, currently in development. The FVRC Prototype Pilot is the immediate proposal: six participants, two demonstration homes, 18-month timeline.
Current Phase: Blueprint Complete — Pilot Authorization in Progress
LHF has completed the conceptual design and published the blueprint for the FVRC Integration Model — a comprehensive, evidence-based framework engineered for pilot implementation the moment authorization and funding align. The design is done. What is needed now is the partnership.
The Next Phase Requires:
- Community land acquisition and FVRC pilot site authorization
- Funding alignment and grant/partnership agreements
- Institutional partnership MOUs and governance structure finalization
- Community stakeholder engagement and alignment
No formal partnership, operational role, or institutional commitment is implied unless expressly established through written agreement.
Transparency & Disclosure
How to Read This Presentation
Every important statistic and claim in this presentation is labeled with one of the following categories. These categories are never interchangeable. A TARGET is not a FACT. A PROJECTION is not EVIDENCE.
🔵 FACT
Externally verified data from government sources: BJS, Prison Policy Initiative, CA LAO, CA DIR, NLIHC
🟢 EVIDENCE
Findings from published research: RAND Corporation, Vera Institute, MDRC, Urban Institute
🟡 PROJECTION
Financial and modeling assumptions: LHF cost model, housing valuation, wage trajectories
🎯 TARGET
Pilot outcome goals LHF intends to achieve and independently measure: 85% employment retention, ≤15% recidivism, 100% housing stability
The Next Step Is Yours.
LHF establishes trust. FVRC communicates the vision. The Prototype Pilot makes the fundable case. The design is complete. The evidence base is grounded. The institution is incorporated. The only thing missing is the partner willing to act.
Phase I funding target
Pilot timeline
Builder-Founders, Cohort 1
You are not funding a program. You are funding the evidence that changes policy. The next step is yours.
Liberate, Not Incarcerate. Build Homes, Not Prisons.